Jail Time for Death Threats in Canada: Understanding the Penalties





Jail Time for Death Threats in Canada: Understanding the Penalties

Yes, you can go to jail for saying death threats. In the Criminal Code, this is an offence known as uttering threats. The sentencing proceeds as follows: Summary Dispositions: minimum: none; maximum: 2 years less a day and/or 5000 fine. Indictable Dispositions: minimum:none, maximum: 2 years incarceration, 5 years incarceration

Factors That Affect Sentencing

Whether the accused entered a plea agreement with the prosecutor in exchange for a reduced penalty, or provided information or assistance to the authorities during the investigation or prosecution.
Refers to circumstances that may lessen the responsibility or moral culpability of the accused, such as acting under duress or coercion or because it was necessary to prevent greater harm.
Evidence or arguments presented by both the prosecutor and the defence that could affect the punishment, such as evidence of the accused’s previous bad acts or extenuating circumstances such as mental illness or addiction.
Refers to the defendant’s military service, public service or other achievements that may be relevant to their sentence.
Indicates the specific laws, policies, and case law in the jurisdiction where the offence was committed that may affect the sentence, such as mandatory minimum sentences, sentencing guidelines, or prevailing community attitudes towards punishment.
Sentencing may take into account how well you have cooperated with law enforcement and other authorities in investigating and prosecuting your case.
The defendant’s age and any physical or mental health problems may be relevant to the court in determining an appropriate sentence. For example, an older defendant or one with a serious health problem may be given a lighter sentence.
The role played by the defendant in the commission of the offence may have an impact on the sentence – a principal or a co-conspirator may receive a more severe sentence than an accomplice or someone who played a minor role.
A defendant’s financial resources and ability to pay fines or other financial penalties may be taken into account in determining an appropriate sentence. The court may consider whether a defendant has the ability to pay restitution to the victim(s) and/or fines to the state.
Sentencing may be influenced by the aim of deterring the accused and others from committing similar offences in the future. A harsh sentence may act as a deterrent, whereas a more lenient sentence may not have the same effect.
Public safety and protection is a key consideration in sentencing. A defendant who poses a significant threat to public safety may be sentenced more severely to ensure he cannot commit further offences.
The defendant’s potential for rehabilitation, or ability to be successfully treated or trained not to reoffend, may be considered in determining an appropriate sentence A defendant who appears likely to be successfully rehabilitated may be sentenced more leniently.
Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences set by state or federal law may be a factor in determining a sentence. The court must follow these guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences, although it may have some discretion in certain cases.
Statutory aggravating circumstances are elements of the offence or of the defendant’s conduct that increase the severity of the sentence, while mitigating circumstances are elements that decrease the severity of the sentence. These factors are often specified in state or federal law.
Community and judicial views on the appropriate punishment for a particular offence may be a factor in determining a sentence. Public opinion and the views of the judge or sentencing panel may influence the perceived severity of a particular sentence.
The extent to which the defendant assisted police or other authorities in investigating or prosecuting the offence may be considered a sentencing factor.
Age, mental health and physical health of an accused person are relevant to sentencing because they affect his or her ability to understand consequences of his or her actions and his or her ability to reform.
The role of the defendant in the commission of the offence may also be taken into account. Those who have played a leading or more active role often receive a more severe sentence.
This factor relates to the specific details and events surrounding the commission of the offence, including the means used and the aggravator and extenuating factors.
This factor considers the defendant’s previous criminal history, including any previous convictions, as well as the defendant’s history of having been sentenced.
This factor considers the overall background of the accused, including education, employment, family circumstances, and any history of drug or alcohol abuse.
This factor takes into account the defendant’s expression of remorse for the offence committed. It includes any apology or expression of regret.
This factor assesses the physical, emotional and financial harm suffered by the victim(s) as a result of the offence and the impact the offence has had on their lives.

Contact Us

Been Arrested or Charged with A Criminal Offence? Get Help Now!

If you have been arrested or need assistance with a criminal matter, contact me to discuss your case.

Jeffrey I Reisman
Criminal Defence Lawyer
1000 Finch Ave. West, Suite 705 A
Toronto, ON M3J 2V5

Phone: 647-370-4282
Email: [email protected]

24/7 Availability And Client Support

20 Years Of Criminal Defence Experience