The maximum sentence for aggravated assault is 14 years in prison.
Factors That Affect Sentencing
Plea bargains or co-operation with prosecutors
Indicates whether the accused reached an agreement with the prosecutor to admit guilt in exchange for a reduced sentence, or whether the accused provided information or assistance to the authorities during the investigation or prosecution.
Mitigating circumstances, such as duress or necessity - Aggravating circumstances
Refers to circumstances that may diminish the degree of responsibility or moral blameworthiness of the defendant for the offence, such as because he or she acted under duress or coercion, or because it was necessary to prevent greater harm.
Any aggravating or mitigating circumstances presented by the prosecutor or defender.
Refers to the evidence or arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence that may have an impact on the sentence, such as evidence of previous bad acts committed by the defendant, or mitigating circumstances such as mental illness or addiction.
Military or civil service record of the defendant
Refers to the accused’s military or public service or other achievements that may be relevant to sentencing him or her.
Relevant legislation, policy and jurisprudence within country
For example, mandatory minimums, sentencing guidelines, or prevailing community attitudes towards punishment.
Defendant co-operating
The extent to which the defendant has cooperated with law enforcement and other authorities in the investigation and prosecution of his own case may be a factor in sentencing. Cooperation can demonstrate acceptance of responsibility and may be considered by the court as a mitigating factor.
Age and physical and mental health of the defendant
The age of the defendant and any physical or mental health problems may be relevant to the court in determining an appropriate sentence, for example, an older defendant or one with a serious health problem may be sentenced more leniently.
Role in offence played by the accused
Sentencing may be harsher than that of accomplices or people who played minor roles.
The financial resources of the accused and his ability to pay fines
The court may consider the ability of the accused to make restitution to the victims or to the State.
The deterrent effect on the defendant and on other persons
Sentences may be influenced by the aim to deter the defendant and others from committing similar offences in the future.
Safety and Protection of the Public
The safety and protection of the public is a key consideration in sentencing. A defendant who poses a significant threat to public safety may be sentenced more severely to ensure that they are unable to commit further crimes.
The potential for rehabilitation of the defendant
The defendant’s rehabilitation potential, or ability to be successfully treated or trained not to reoffend, may be considered in determining an appropriate sentence. A defendant who appears likely to be successfully rehabilitated may be sentenced more leniently.
Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences in your jurisdiction
Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences set by state or federal law may be a factor in determining a sentence. The court must follow these guidelines and mandatory minimums, although it may have some discretion in certain cases.
Statutory aggravating or mitigating circumstances - Aggravating circumstances
Aggravation is a factor in the offense or conduct which increases the penalty, whereas mitigation is a factor which decreases the penalty.
Community and judicial views on sentencing
Public opinion and judges’ or sentencers’ views may influence perceptions of harshness of a particular sentence.
The cooperation of the defendant with the authorities
The extent to which the defendant has assisted the police or other authorities in the investigation or prosecution of the offence may be taken into account as a sentencing factor.
Age and mental/physical health of the accused
Age, mental and physical health of an accused person are relevant to sentencing because they affect his or her ability to understand consequences of his or her actions and his or her ability to reform.
Defendant's role in the crime
The role of the defendant in committing the crime may also be taken into account, with those who played a leading or more active role often receiving more severe penalties.
Type and circumstances of crime
This factor refers to the specific details and events surrounding the crime committed, including the method used and any extenuating or mitigating circumstances.
Criminal record of defendant
This factor considers the defendant’s criminal history, including any previous convictions, and the defendant’s history of previous convictions.
Defendant's Character and History
This factor considers the overall background of the accused, including education, employment, family background and any history of drug or alcohol abuse.
Accused's remorse or lack of remorse
This factor takes into account the defendant’s expression of remorse for the crime committed, including any apology or expression of regret.
Impact of the crime on the victim(s) of the crime
This factor is an assessment of the physical, emotional and financial harm that the victim(s) have suffered as a result of the crime and the impact of the crime on their lives.
Contact Us
Been Arrested or Charged with A Criminal Offence? Get Help Now!
If you have been arrested or need assistance with a criminal matter, contact me to discuss your case.
Jeffrey I Reisman
Criminal Defence Lawyer
1000 Finch Ave. West, Suite 705 A
Toronto, ON M3J 2V5
Phone:Â 647-370-4282
Email:Â jeffreyireisman@gmail.com
24/7 Availability And Client Support
20 Years Of Criminal Defence Experience
REQUEST A CONSULTATION