Sentence for Rape in Canada: An Overview





Sentence for Rape in Canada: An Overview

In Canada, the term “rape” is not used. All assaults of a sexual nature are grouped into the offence of sexual assault. The sentence for sexual assault will vary depending on the unique circumsances of the offence and the offender. However, case law indicates that the starting position for sentencing is 3 years of jail.

Factors That Affect Sentencing

Indicates whether the defendant has reached an agreement with the prosecution to enter a guilty plea in exchange for a reduced sentence, or whether the defendant has provided information or assistance to the authorities during the investigation or prosecution of the case.
Refers to circumstances that may reduce the responsibility or moral culpability of the accused, such as acting under duress or coercion, or because it was necessary to prevent greater harm.
Refers to evidence or arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence that may affect the sentence, such as evidence of past bad acts committed by the accused, or mitigating factors such as mental illness or addiction.
Refers to the defendant’s military service, public service, or other achievements that may be relevant to the sentence.
Indicates the specific legislation, policies and case law in the jurisdiction where the offence has been committed that might affect the sentence, for example, mandatory minimums, sentencing guidelines or prevailing community attitudes towards punishment.
The extent to which the defendant has cooperated with law enforcement and other authorities in the investigation and prosecution of his own case may be a factor in sentencing. Cooperation may demonstrate an acceptance of responsibility and may be considered by the court as a mitigating factor.
Age and any physical or mental health problems may also play a role in a court deciding on a suitable sentence.
The defendant’s role in the commission of the offence may affect their sentence. A principal or a conspirator may receive a more severe sentence than a collaborator or someone who played a lesser role.
The financial resources and ability of the accused to pay fines or other financial penalties may be considered in determining an appropriate sentence. The court may consider the ability of the accused to pay compensation to the victims and/or fines to the State.
Sentencing may be influenced by the aim to deter the defendant and others from committing similar offences in the future. A severe sentence may act as a deterrent, while a more lenient sentence may not have the same effect.
Public safety and protection is a key consideration in sentencing. A defendant who poses a significant threat to public safety may be sentenced more severely to ensure he cannot commit further offences.
The potential of the defendant to be rehabilitated, or the ability to be successfully treated or trained so as not to reoffend, may be taken into account in determining an appropriate sentence. A defendant who appears to have a high probability of being successfully rehabilitated may be sentenced more leniently.
A court is required to follow sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimums established by state or federal law, but has some discretion to do so.
Statutory aggravators are elements of the crime or the defendant’s conduct that increase the penalty, while statutory mitigators are elements that decrease the penalty.
Public opinion and the views of judges or sentencers may influence the perception of the harshness of a given sentence.
The extent to which the defendant has assisted the police or other authorities in investigating or prosecuting the offence may be considered as a sentencing factor.
Age, mental and physical health of an accused person may be relevant in sentencing, as these factors may affect his or her ability to understand consequences of his or her actions and his or her capacity for rehabilitation.
The defendant’s role in committing the offence may also be considered, with those who played a leading or active role often receiving harsher sentences.
This factor relates to the specific details and events surrounding the offence, including method and aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
This factor takes into account the defendant’s previous criminal record, including any previous convictions, and the defendant’s history of previous sentences.
This factor considers the defendant’s general background, including education, employment, family situation, and drug/alcohol history.
This factor considers the defendant’s expression of remorse for the crime, including apologies or expressions of regret.
This factor assesses the physical, emotional and financial damage suffered by the victim(s) as a result of the crime and how the crime has affected their lives.

Contact Us

Been Arrested or Charged with A Criminal Offence? Get Help Now!

If you have been arrested or need assistance with a criminal matter, contact me to discuss your case.

Jeffrey I Reisman
Criminal Defence Lawyer
1000 Finch Ave. West, Suite 705 A
Toronto, ON M3J 2V5

Phone: 647-370-4282
Email: [email protected]

24/7 Availability And Client Support

20 Years Of Criminal Defence Experience